Re: [hylafax-users] mis-interpreted senderID?

[Mark <hylafax2@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Lee Howard <faxguy <at> howardsilvan.com> writes:

> 
> Mark wrote:
> 
> >Dec 07 13:17:09.10: [ 8675]: <-- [9:AT+FRH=3\r]
> >Dec 07 13:17:09.37: [ 8675]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> >Dec 07 13:17:11.08: [ 8675]: --> [2:OK]
> >Dec 07 13:17:11.08: [ 8675]: REMOTE TSI "0q       +4618343428"
> >
> 
> Could you reproduce this log for us, but with SessionTracing at 0xFFF.  
> It would be nice to see the HDLC frame data here.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lee.


By the way, Lee,

I happened to start my logging effort with both SESSION and SERVER tracings set
to 0xFFF.  Like that the inbound fax received/displayed no senderID at all -

When I turned SERVERTRACING back to 1, and leaving session tracing at 0xFFF, the
senderID showed up as it should (though with the "0q" in the senderID) ...

Mark




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*