![]() |
* In reply to <48D2C520.1050501@xxxxxxxxx> Enrique Arredondo said:I'm confused. Can you email me that previous message ?
Hi,
Hi, I'm not sure what this had to do with the previous message you replied to, but...
Well I don't see any differences, so I guess it's the ghostscript version, because I tried it on SCO OSR6 and OSR507 with their respective hylafax installations and they both have the same result when it uses the LINUX hylafax server.I'm having an issue with the way sendfax converts ASCII to PS on different OS's, and I can't figure it out, I have a linux server running hylafax and if I send a fax within linux, I get a clean fax, so then I installed hylafax for SCO on another server so that I can use send faxes using sco's sendfax as a client through the linux server, the issue is that when I ran sendfax on SCO box, the ps is coming out different than the one generated by linux (when I compare the same ascii file).
The "textfmt" tool (sendfax uses this to convert ASCI -> PS) uses system ghostscript fonts.
If you use sendfax -v, you can see how textfmt is run by sendfax. You should see something like: rule: offset 0 ascii = -- success (result postscript, rule "textfmt -B -f Courier-Bold -Ml=0.4in -p 11 -s %s >%o <%i") CONVERT "textfmt -B -f Courier-Bold -Ml=0.4in -p 11 -s default >'/tmp//sndfaxQvIHCb' <'/tmp//sndfaxlPhLfK'"
With that, you'll be abel tos ee the exact textfmt invocation used, and from that you can start chasing down what's different between the 2 systems. Some of the things different could be:
1) Compile options (packages often vary them)
2) page sizes
3) typerule 4) Fonts available
etc.
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*