Re: [hylafax-users] Update request to wedged script

[Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

George H wrote:
> On 3/3/08, Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
> > I didn't apply $DICTRECEIVEAGENT to the wedged script, because I wasn't
> >  sure that "The HylaFAX Receive Agent" was really appropriate for the
> >  wedged script in the first place.  For example, wedged can be invoked in
> >  a send-only configuration (and is actually invoked from faxq and not
> >  faxgetty).
> >
> >  So I was looking for a better name to give wedged than "The HylaFAX
> >  Receive Agent".  Got any suggestions?
> >     
>
> Hmm well for me it makes sense to have them both the same cos I use
> faxgetty. But I guess you could use just plain old "root" if it has to
> be generic. That or the value can be a parameter and "HylaFAX Receive
> Agent" can be the default if the param is null.

Since it is what it is, I figure that it can't hurt to leave it as 
$DICTRECEIVEAGENT until someone complains or comes up with something 
better.  So, I've followed your original request here.

This only "dictionary-ifies" the From header... the rest of the e-mail 
is still static.  I can continue "dictionary-ing" the rest of the e-mail 
as requested, etc.

Thanks,

Lee.


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*