Re: [hylafax-users] Update request to wedged script

["George H" <george.dma@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> George H wrote:
>  > On 3/3/08, Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  >
>  >> I didn't apply $DICTRECEIVEAGENT to the wedged script, because I wasn't
>  >>  sure that "The HylaFAX Receive Agent" was really appropriate for the
>  >>  wedged script in the first place.  For example, wedged can be invoked in
>  >>  a send-only configuration (and is actually invoked from faxq and not
>  >>  faxgetty).
>  >>
>  >>  So I was looking for a better name to give wedged than "The HylaFAX
>  >>  Receive Agent".  Got any suggestions?
>  >>
>  >
>  > Hmm well for me it makes sense to have them both the same cos I use
>  > faxgetty. But I guess you could use just plain old "root" if it has to
>  > be generic. That or the value can be a parameter and "HylaFAX Receive
>  > Agent" can be the default if the param is null.
>
>  Since it is what it is, I figure that it can't hurt to leave it as
>  $DICTRECEIVEAGENT until someone complains or comes up with something
>  better.  So, I've followed your original request here.
>
>  This only "dictionary-ifies" the From header... the rest of the e-mail
>  is still static.  I can continue "dictionary-ing" the rest of the e-mail
>  as requested, etc.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Lee.
>

Thanks :)  The From header is basically what I was looking for.


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*