![]() |
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 11:42:10 -0800 Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As far as getting the fax through, though, the 4.3.1 bug is essentially > cosmetic in the logs; the fax *is* getting through. However, the bug is > causing it to send with MH image compression instead of MMR, I was wondering about this myself. Logs from previous HylaFax versions would usually show a conversion to MMR (2-D) if the receiver had that capability. But with the several faxes I sent today using a new install of 4.3.1 all were transmitted as MH (1-D) and all receivers indicated MMR. > and so your > toll costs will probably increase slightly as it will need to transmit > more data. I don't know how important that is to you. If it is > important, then I would suggest upgrading to 5.0.3... and well, I'd > normally suggest upgrading anyway. > Within a few days I'll install 5.0.3. Andrew Kalten ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*