HylaFAX The world's most advanced open source fax server |
* Stephen Arnold <arnold.steve@xxxxxxxxx> [031202 16:31]: > On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 13:02, Lee Howard wrote: > [snip] > > So, really, I just don't know enough about how > > Fedora will work to want to spend the time to try out the "hobbyist" > > version when it would be just as easy for me to migrate to something > > like Debian that I already understand well enough to know what to > > expect. > > > > Will Fedora release security updates? Will up2date work with Fedora? > > Is "Fedora" just a new name for "RawHide"? > > As best I know: Yes, Not Sure, and No. Fedora has some good info (still > evolving) on their site, and I guess they already have an RC1 release. > There's some link to the rawhide stuff, but fedora is supposed to be a > "real" distro (not a hobby thing). But they aren't aiming for stable, solid, no-chance-of-bad, etc. They've said that fedora will always only keep "latest" packages, etc. No bug fixes, etc, carried for "old" packages. > I have one debian install, but not much chance to play with it. I've > used redhat since 2.0.1 so I have some time/skills invested in it. > Fedora looks like a logical path to me (but I'll still try and learn > debian in my copious free time...) You might want to look a little more > closely at fedora; in some ways I think it could be even better than > RedHat. I think the only way fedora will become "used" by production folks is if they split it and start following the debian stable/testing/unstable branches, basically providing 3 OSes. But the community is going to have to do that - RedHat isn't - they don't want people using fedora as production platform. They want them using ES/AS. > Just my $.02 worth. and mine... (and so goes another debian user off to work on another redhat server) -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@xxxxxxxxxxx command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
Attachment:
pgp00003.pgp
Description: PGP signature