![]() |
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:23:00PM -0500, Mark J wrote: > Feb 25 12:57:47.94: [ 1465]: <-- [5:ATH0\r] > Feb 25 12:57:51.39: [ 1465]: --> > [50:WLh@FD%mO.^za-IwXvUw4zmZ%w7G;NlK#+"K;xG] > Feb 25 12:57:51.39: [ 1465]: --> [10:NO CARRIER] If I'm not mistaken, that's what you get when one end of the link *does* have error correction, and the other end does not, which is not an uncommon situation for paging links. My guess, though, would be that there's a command coming from a .hylarc that the *users* get, but the webserver doesn't; what *differences*, if any, are there between logs from the two job sources? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Baylink RFC 2100 The Suncoast Freenet The Things I Think Tampa Bay, Florida http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 "If you don't have a dream; how're you gonna have a dream come true?" -- Captain Sensible, The Damned (from South Pacific's "Happy Talk") ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null