Re: [hylafax-users] Speeding hylafax

["Jim TheVoice" <spirit89@globetrotter.net>]

That's very nice, but are we doing something to solve that problem?

Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Giulio Orsero" <giulioo@pobox.com>
To: <hylafax-users@hylafax.org>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] Speeding hylafax


> On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 10:18:50 -0600, you wrote:
>
> >In what way?  If you've got ten faxes all for the same destination, how
is
> >retrying the same destination with a different fax job going to have any
> >better chance of success than retrying the same destionation with the
same
> >fax job?
>
> I have a similar problem.
>
> Say I send 1 fax to 1 destination:
> busy, wait 5mins, retry, this is ok, even for 12 times.
>
> Say I send 100 faxes for 100 different destinations:
> #1 is busy, reschedule in 5 mins, send 2 other faxes, retry #1 busy,
reschedule
> in 5 mins, send 2 other faxes, 1 of them is busy, reschedule ...
>
> Right now, if 10 out of those 100 faxses are destined to be busy (even
always
> busy) they are always rescheduled and tried in between the other 90.
> 12 * 10 = 120 tries intermingled the others (even if you lower the
maxdials you
> get similar problems in minor proportions). If instead these 10 jobs could
be
> tried only after the other 90 are sent, these 90 would be sent very
quickly.
>
> Basically, I'd like some mechanism to put the busy faxes at the end of the
list,
> so all other faxes are tried and the busy ones left at the end.
> Maybe decreasing the priority (+1) of a job each time it's busy would do
it.
>
> --
> giulioo@pobox.com
>
>
> ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List
_______________________
>  To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org <
/dev/null
>
>



____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null