![]() |
On Sat, Jul 17, 1999 at 11:28:21AM +0100, David Woolley wrote: > > Have anyone implemented HylaFAX using DID (Direct Inward Dial) before? I > > find little information about this topic. > > That's because a DID extension is indistinguishable from an exchange line > as far as hylafax is concerned. > > I think you have not fully specified your problem and are maybe using > DID to refer to some specific PABX option, not in its generic sense. Perhaps I misunderstood him, David, but I gathered he was wondering whether it was possible to use HylaFax with hardware that terminates a DID-style telco trunk, picking off the inpulsing to determine where to route the incoming fax. The short answer to the original question is "no". Anything that is not logically a faxmodem, HylaFax is not designed to work with. Any device that presents as a serial port with an AT command set modem behind it will work -- no matter _what_ actual hardware is behind the device driver. As I noted before, there is motion afoot to port much of the Natural Microsystems driver code to Linux; see www.opentelecom.org, among other sites. Or, in other words: FAQ! FAQ! FAQ! Please remember folks: we (well, ok; "they") don't maintain those mailing list archives for [our] health... we maintain them for _yours_. Please look there... Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Buy copies of The New Hackers Dictionary. The Suncoast Freenet Give them to all your friends. Tampa Bay, Florida http://www.ccil.org/jargon/ +1 813 790 7592