Hylafax Developers Mailing List Archives
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[hylafax-devel] Re: flexfax: Sendproblem with Hylafax from cvs
Robert Colquhoun <rjc@trump.net.au> writes:
> > > The NSF stuff looked fairly straightforward, an obvious commit. The RTN
> > > and corresponding config stuff i still need to check though - i am nervous
> > > about the default option been for hylafax to send no RTC whatsoever, i am
> > > thinking there might be alot of modems out there that 'accidently' worked
> > > because hylafax previously sent a RTC no matter what.
> >
> >There are not so many Class 2.0 modems in the market. I think we should try
> >(and ask their users to check if they still work) until we have some time
> >before next Hylafax release. There is no other way -- Hylafax should comply
> >with Class 2.0 specs. But leaving everything in the present state IMHO is not
> >acceptable option.
>
> It's not just the class 2.0 modems - hylafax has been sending tiff files
> with included RTC to the ordinary class 2 modems as well.
Only when using buggy Ghostscript. AFAIK Sam Leffler originally used other
Postscript rasterizer (by SGI) which did not append that wrong extra
RTC. And all Class2 modems he tested worked for him. Ask also Harald
Pollack -- he does not append RTC in his fax program, and all
Class2/Class2.0 modems still work (except USR which is the special
case). What else proof do you need?
Hope to hear from you soon,
Dmitry
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Developers Mailing List ____________________
To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-devel-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null