The problem is my job gets REJECTED after 2-3 attempts, even when faxstat -s show its going to try 6 times, and I have the usual settings in my config.ttyX file. Thanks !
My Command line is :
sendfax -h
POOL@xxxxxxxxx -S
FreeFax.co.il -k now + 48 hours -P 50 -F From
FreeFax.co.il|%c|Page %%P of %%T -x 25-5-2010-16-47-00-173132146217^13^ -T 6 -t 6 -D -n -f
elirani@xxxxxxxxx -d 1800111111 /path/to/pdf.pdf
My Q file has this in its content.
tts:1274794908
killtime:1274967648
retrytime:0
state:6
npages:0
skippages:0
nocountcover:0
serverdocover:0
ignoremodembusy:0
totpages:1
ntries:0
ndials:0
totdials:0
maxdials:6
tottries:0
maxtries:6
pagewidth:209
resolution:196
pagelength:296
priority:50
schedpri:50
minbr:0
desiredbr:13
desiredst:0
desiredec:2
desireddf:3
desiredtl:1
useccover:1
usexvres:0
usecolor:0
skippedpages:0
canonical:1800111111
external:1800111111
number:1800111111
mailaddr:elirani@xxxxxxxxxsender:elirani
jobid:1073318
jobtag:
pagehandling:01c1Z0097P
modem:HOT
modemused:
faxnumber:
faxname:
tsi:
FreeFax.co.ilreceiver:
company:25-5-2010-16-41-39-173132146217^13^
location:
voice:
fromcompany:
fromlocation:
fromvoice:
regarding:
comments:
cover:
client:localhost.localdomain
owner:eliran
groupid:1073318
signalrate:
dataformat:
jobtype:facsimile
tagline:From
FreeFax.co.il|%c|Page %%P of %%T
subaddr:
passwd:
doneop:default
commid:
csi:
nsf:
timeofday:
errorcode:
status:
returned:0
notify:when done
pagechop:default
chopthreshold:3
!pdf:0::docq/doc1073326.pdf.1073318
fax:0::docq/doc1073326.pdf;1d81
2010/5/25 Lee Howard
<faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Eliran Itzhak wrote:
Thanks, But I already had these in my config.* files, But it does not effect the REJECT msg.
This is what I currently have :
JobReqBusy: 30
JobReqNoAnswer: 60
JobReqNoCarrier: 30
JobReqNoFCon: 30
JobReqOther: 30
JobReqProto: 30
JobRetryBusy:6
JobRetryDataConn:6
JobRetryNoAnswer:6
JobRetryNoCarrier:6
JobRetryOther:6
MaxDials:6
MaxTries:6
It keeps "rejecting" some jobs after 3 attempts.
So how are you submitting the jobs? And what does the sendq file have in it?
Thanks,
Lee.