[hylafax-users] questioning the sense of RETURNFILETYPE

[Jörn Friedrich Dreyer <dreyer@xxxxxxxx>]

Looking at the code again I have to question the whole process of
regenerating the files when the user requested them with the
notification. 

Nobody wants to explicitly set RETURNFILETYPE to a specific file format.
My users just dont trust hylafax and want to see the data that was sent
to the recipient, which turns out to be a tif. From what I understand
the email2fax gateway already converts a file to tif before feeding it
to hylafax. THAT is the file the user wants to receive via email,
because he wants to know if the content was readable enough ...
regenerating the file kind of defeats the purpose of sending the file
back to the user.

opinions?

so long

Jörn  

- 
Jörn Friedrich Dreyer
   Tel. +49 (0)561 - 574 32 77 - 41
   Email dreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Yatta Solutions GmbH
   Sitz der Gesellschaft: Kassel
   Amtsgericht Kassel, HRB 14720
   USt-IdNr DE263191529

Geschäftsführung:
   Johannes Jacop,
   Dr. Christian Schneider

Anschrift:
   Ludwig-Erhard-Straße 12
   34131 Kassel
   
Kontakt:
   Tel. +49 (0)561 - 574 32 77 - 0
   Fax +49 (0)3221 - 1321 - 586
   Email info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bankverbindung:
   Kasseler Bank eG
   BLZ: 520 900 00
   Kto.-Nr.: 158 305



____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*