Re: [hylafax-users] Failure to receive silence (synchronization failure)

[Andrew Rinaldi <andrew.rinaldi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alex R [MaxoTel] wrote:
> Ah-huh....
>
> Well other people tend to get better results than me, that's all, so I guess
> I assumed that since I was in such close proximity to the terminations (2ms,
> over a peering arrangement) that I'd be able to achieve perfect results with
> T.30
>
> But, I've just called the VSP and they told me they do support T.38 - so I
> guess I will try Hylafax with that. What I am thinking of doing is using
> Callweaver (which claims to have T38 ability), but I really did want the
> compatibility of Hylafax. Are there any Hylafax add-ons/virtual modems that
> do direct T.38?
T.38 cannot solve the fundamental problems you face with VoIP..... it 
uses various 'tricks' in an attempt to improve reliability over UDP but 
none of that is foolproof.   Please also be aware that you also lose 
valuable features such as V.34 high speed fax when using T.38

If reliability is important to you then invest in a POTS analog line.

Regards

Andrew Rinaldi
Mainpine Developer Support
USA +1 866 363 6680 | UK +44 1225 807 807
andrew.rinaldi@xxxxxxxxxxxx | www.mainpine.com


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*