![]() |
OK, some progress: Sven Hergenhahn schrieb: > Feb 4 17:08:16 x66 FaxGetty[27887]: STATE CHANGE: RUNNING -> LISTENING > Feb 4 17:08:16 x66 FaxGetty[27887]: --> [18:RING CID: 0 DAD: 9] Feb 05 12:26:03.91: [ 5523]: CallID: '0' '9' Feb 05 12:26:03.91: [ 5523]: CallID: '0' '9' Feb 05 12:26:03.91: [ 5523]: <-- [4:ATA\r] Feb 05 12:26:03.91: [ 5523]: --> [6:CID: 0] Feb 05 12:26:03.91: [ 5523]: --> [6:DAD: 9] Yep, tested and confirmed with minicom that the internal fax machine I was using to test does not send a CID, so that it is only a '0'. But still - shouldn't it then set Sender to '0' in the tiff? faxinfo says: # faxinfo ../recvq/fax000000054.tif ../recvq/fax000000054.tif: Sender: Pages: 1 Quality: Fine Page: ISO A4 Received: 2008:02:05 12:26:18 TimeToRecv: 0:09 SignalRate: 14400 bit/s DataFormat: 1-D MH ErrCorrect: No CallID1: 0 CallID2: 9 See? Sender is not '0' but just empty. Any ideas? Thanks, Sven ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*