Re: [hylafax-users] "COMREC invalid response.." persisting in HylaFAX+ 5.2.0

[Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Walter Hop wrote:
> I've followed your test plan (which was very detailed, thank you), and 
> it turns out that ECM seems to be the culprit. When I disable ECM mode 
> with the -E parameter, faxes to the problem destination succeed (for 
> the first time in ca. 100 attempts, so this is probably no coincidence.)
>
>
> > To test #4 please run:
>
> >   sendfax -n -1 -E -t 1 -F "test" -h cuad0@ -d 003232xxxxxx /tmp/test.ps
>
> > If this fails then we know that the problem is not with any particulars
>
> > of the ECM protocol as employed by the receiver or HylaFAX.  If it 
>
> > succeeds, then stop; #4 is likely the issue; again, let me know if the
>
> > receiver is printing out all of the pages.
>
>
> The fax was successful with this parameter.

And from before:
> Dec 12 14:59:26.61: [ 1373]: <-- [11:AT+FTM=146\r]
> Dec 12 14:59:26.63: [ 1373]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> Dec 12 14:59:26.63: [ 1373]: DELAY 400 ms
> Dec 12 14:59:27.03: [ 1373]: <-- data [1032]
> Dec 12 14:59:27.03: [ 1373]: <-- data [1029]
> Dec 12 14:59:27.03: [ 1373]: <-- data [1034]
> Dec 12 14:59:28.06: [ 1373]: <-- data [1032]
> Dec 12 14:59:28.06: [ 1373]: <-- data [873]
> Dec 12 14:59:29.25: [ 1373]: <-- data [2]
> Dec 12 14:59:29.81: [ 1373]: --> [2:OK]
> Dec 12 14:59:29.81: [ 1373]: <-- [9:AT+FTS=9\r]
> Dec 12 14:59:29.90: [ 1373]: --> [2:OK]
> Dec 12 14:59:29.90: [ 1373]: <-- [9:AT+FTH=3\r]
> Dec 12 14:59:30.76: [ 1373]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> Dec 12 14:59:30.76: [ 1373]: <-- HDLC<7:FF C8 FD F4 00 04 08>
> Dec 12 14:59:30.76: [ 1373]: <-- data [8]
> Dec 12 14:59:30.76: [ 1373]: <-- data [2]
> Dec 12 14:59:31.19: [ 1373]: --> [2:OK]
> Dec 12 14:59:31.19: [ 1373]: SEND send PPS (partial page signal)
> Dec 12 14:59:31.19: [ 1373]: SEND send EOP (no more pages or documents)
> Dec 12 14:59:31.19: [ 1373]: <-- [9:AT+FRH=3\r]
> Dec 12 14:59:31.33: [ 1373]: --> [7:CONNECT]
> Dec 12 14:59:32.55: [ 1373]: --> HDLC<5:FF C8 5F C8 E7>
> Dec 12 14:59:32.56: [ 1373]: --> [2:OK]
> Dec 12 14:59:32.56: [ 1373]: SEND recv DCN (disconnect) 

It's obvious to me now.  :-)

The PPS-EOP signal is bad.  To be exact, the "block number" in the 
PPS-EOP signal is bad.  It should be "00" and not "04" for the first 
block.  This is happening because blockNumber is not being properly 
initialized to zero, and your compiler didn't catch me on the blunder.

I believe that I have fixed this, now, in 5.2.1.  Please update to 
HylaFAX+ 5.2.1, and test again.  It should now be good.  Please let me 
know how things go.

Thanks,

Lee.


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*