HylaFAX The world's most advanced open source fax server |
George H wrote: >The percentage of hylafax errors on received faxes seem to be around 16%-18% on all 4 lines. >1 Line is connected to POTS, 1 line is going through a PBX, and the other 2 lines are going through an E1 Gateway. >They all have around the same success and failure rates 10-17% errors, and 82-88% success. To be honest George you have so many variables here that I doubt you will make any real progress unless you simplify your setup. I'm sure you can understand the number of variables you have with 3 'line' types (possibly including VoIP), two modem types, and an unknown number of fax machines and document types. My suggestion is that you deploy a Mainpine IQ Express card, the latest version of HylaFAX+, a single modern fax machine, a ITU-T test document, and use your POTS line ONLY while testing (the fax machine will also require a POTS line). With HylaFAX+ logging enabled you should then focus on achieving the error rates that you require with the help of the people in this forum. Once you have a solid solution as a reference you can then start adding ONE variable at a time - the different line types, modems, fax machines, and document types, will all have an impact on your test environment. If you buy a Mainpine board you will have 30 days in which to return the board if it does not resolve your problems.... we will also do everything we can to resolve your issues. Note: my recommendation to use HylaFAX+ is not because it is "better" than HylaFAX.... I suspect that you will get a faster response from Lee to any fax protocol issues that you find in HylaFAX+ (not that I believe you will find any). PLEASE note that as a company we actively support and promote both HylaFAX and HylaFAX+.... so please don't beat me up over this recommendation ! Regards Andrew Rinaldi Mainpine Developer Support USA +1 503 822 9944 | UK +44 8458 909438 andrew.rinaldi@xxxxxxxxxxxx | www.mainpine.com
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>