![]() |
>>> SNIP <<< >Lee Howard <faxguy <at> howardsilvan.com> writes: > In Class 2 the modem is handling the copy quality checking (and > correction). So although HylaFAX doesn't see the errors (because the > modem "fixed" them) the modem did, and thus it correctly sends RTN to > indicate to the sender that the page quality was unacceptable. > > That said, the +FPTS response there indicates 816 lines of image data > (which roughly corresponds to what the modem delivered to HylaFAX). Add > that shortness to the size of the data (211+ K), and something seems > awfully weird here. > > This modem is set up in Class2, works more reliably for me than Class1. > > The MT5634 modems work well in Class 2.0 and 2.1 - I can't vouch for > them in Class 2, although I expect them to work tolerably well there > also. That said, I really cannot fathom them working any less reliably > in Class 1 than they do in Class 2. > > What problems were you having in Class 1 that convinced you that you > needed to switch to Class 2? > > Lee. > Odd, Lee, faxaddmodem only lets me set up these modems as class1 or class2. Won't let me do 2.0 or 2.1, says the modem only has support for classes 1 and 2. And I do have their latest 8.19j firmware. If I recall correctly with class1 I was getting "Unspecified phase D" errors and this was occurring from numerous senders - and when I changed back to class2 this went away. /Mark ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*