Re: [hylafax-users] a quickie

["Peter Verhoeven" <Peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Darren,

Do you mean one of these files below? It's easily reproducible for me.
Just sent a bunch of faxes to the same number, and all but the first one
or two nd up being Blocked forever. Until the next hylafax stop/ start
cycle at least - then 1 more is sent and the rest remain blocked
forever, repeat...

/etc/logrotate.d/syslog
/etc/sysconfig/syslog
/etc/rc.d/init.d/syslog
/var/lock/subsys/syslog 

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Nickerson [mailto:darren.nickerson@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, 9 February 2007 9:52 AM
To: Peter Verhoeven; Lee Howard
Cc: hylafax-user
Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] a quickie

"Peter Verhoeven" <Peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks Lee - "Hylafax+" ? First I've heard of that ;)
>
> Is it safe to install over the top of an existing Hylafax 4.3.1 
> installation in production. i.e. can I just "rpm -U 
> hylafax-5.0.4-1rh9.i386.rpm"? Will it overwrite my config files?
>
> Asumming that RH9 is what I should be using in case of Centos 4.3.

Just FYI, we're not aware of a bug in 4.3.1 that would orphan sendq/
files such as you saw. If you have the logs (syslog will do for a start)
from around the time these jobs were submitted, we'd be very interested
in taking a look. You can mail them to me directly.

-Darren


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
  To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
 On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
  *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*