Re: [hylafax-users] response to +fclass

[Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Madsen Wikholm wrote:

> I've got an iTegno GSM modem that I'm trying to get installed for 
> hylafax. The problem seems to be that the response to +fclass=? 
> includes the +fclass: string upfront which apparently is not valid.
> I've seen patches mentioned that might solve this problem but I'm 
> unable to find any patches. If there are some patches maybe someone 
> could point me in the right direction or if none exist, maybe someone 
> could point me to the right place in the code to start braking things.


Either Conexant or Linuxant did that +FCLASS: prefixing stuff at one 
point in time in the past.  I believe that they fixed it in later 
firmware revisions.

I worked on some patches at some point in time in the past to work 
around the issue, and the problem reporter was testing them.  However, 
ultimately it turned out that the problem wasn't just with +FCLASS=?, 
but with many, many different kinds of responses, some during the fax 
session itself... and working around them posed a bigger problem than 
was initially expected, and so the workarounds never were fully 
developed because the problem reporter ended up going back to the modem 
manufacturer for a fixed firmware.

If, truly, the error is only with +FCLASS=? response then you can use 
this in your modem config file to work around the problem:

 ModemClassQueryCmd: "!0,1"

Lee.

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*