![]() |
Lee Howard wrote / napĂsal(a): > Juraj Bednar wrote: > >>>> http://flz.sk.cx/faxout.jpg >>>> >>>> > Are you absolutely certain that this image corresponds to this session log? > > The reason I doubt is because the session says that MMR was used, and > yet the image shows data loss or corruption... and that kind of loss > cannot occur in the middle of MMR image data - any data loss or data > corruption will always truncate the image. Furthermore, the session > (although the second page failed) used ECM and the receiver confirmed > receipt with MCF... so image corruption would be extremely unlikely. http://flz.sk.cx/fax.log This one is correct. It seems that it also used MMR. I should say, that the problem occured only with this kind of fax machine on the receiving side (it's Panasonic UF-S10) up to now, but we tried several of this type. It's quite common here :(. Anyways, this one also uses MMR, as it seems. Couldn't it be, that the image is sent and received correctly, but the fax is not fast enough to print it and does not have buffer to hold the data, so it has to loose parts of the image. Is it possible to slow down sending of image data somehow? Best wishes, Juraj. ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*