Re: [hylafax-users] MultiTech ISI5634UPCI/8

[Stephen Carville <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

support wrote:
> Hi Chris.
>
> We test with dozens of different fax machines and fax/modems in the lab and
> thousands in the field.  We typically see failure rates well below 1% and I
> don't think you should expect anything like the 5-10% failure rate proposed.

Are you all talking about inbound or outbound?  I have an ISI 5634PCI/8 
with three lines incoming and 4 line outgoing (P.01 GOS) and, since I 
switch to some faster hardware, my worst incoming error rate over a week 
was 2 pages in 1263.  So far every outgoing error but one has been a 
result of a  bad number or a customer who forgot to connect his fax 
line.  That one was a fax number that rolled over to voice mail if the 
line was busy.

> Can you imagine what this sort of failure rate would mean to a customer like
> FedEx or the IRS ?

In the case of the IRS I could hope for extinction :-)

> Regards
>
> Andrew Rinaldi
> Mainpine Support
> e: support@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> w: http://www.mainpine.com
> t: +44(0) 1373 830888
> f: +44(0) 1373 830768
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hylafax-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:hylafax-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Funk
> Sent: 14 September 2005 16:06
> To: hylafax-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] MultiTech ISI5634UPCI/8
>
> Hi All,
>
> Just as a general question.  I have 2 of the ports dedicated to receiving
> faxes from only a couple customers.  These are larger businesses and I
> receive 100% of their faxes correctly.  Then 3 of the other ports are in a
> hunt group, and we receive faxes from small businesses (audit records)  I'm
> guessing that the faxes we receive from the 2nd group are coming from a lot
> of cheap fax machines and or fax/modems.  Is it realistic to think that I'll
> ever receive more than 90-95% successful from that 2nd group given the vast
> number of different fax machines??
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
>
>
> > Chris Funk wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Sep 12 09:40:40.81: [24105]: RECV received frame number 46 Sep 12 
> > > 09:40:40.85: [24105]: RECV received frame number 47 Sep 12 
> > > 09:40:40.97: [24105]: FCS error Sep 12 09:41:25.83: [24105]: EOT 
> > > received (end of transmission) Sep 12 09:41:25.83: [24105]: Received 
> > > premature V.34 termination.
> >
> > > Unfortunately, there's nothing that HylaFAX can do here.
> >
> > > The modem tells us that we got an FCS (frame check) error - and that's 
> > > not that unusual, but from that moment on we don't get any data at all 
> > > until the line disconnects 45 seconds later.
> > >
> > >
> > > You could try running Class 1 instead of Class 1.0 and see if the same 
> > > kinds of "sudden disconnections" occur.  If they do, then it's 
> > > probably not the modem firmware (as V.34 will not be used with Class 1).
> > >
> > > Lee.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Lee.  I'll try the class 1.  Here is another error I have been 
> > getting on that modem.
> >
> > "Failed to properly detect high-speed data carrier."
>
>
> I don't know if this is related. However I recently pretty much eliminated
> the above error by downgrading the firmware on another brand of multitech
> modem (MT5634ZPX-PCI-V92) from 1.32i to 1.25p.
>
> I would assume there is some common code between the different firmware and
> it might be the cause of your problem.
>
> Steve Tuckner at Multitech provided me with 1.25p firmware awhile back.
> He might be able to shed some light on the potential problem you have and
> the one I had.


--
Stephen Carville <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unix and Network Admin
Nationwide Totalflood
6033 W. Century Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-342-3602

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*