![]() |
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > PostScript, PDF, and TIFF all guarantee this. Word and HTML cannot. > > So, my using antiword here is just a couple steps better than using > > wvPS here, which is just a bit better (I suppose to these folks) than > > saying, "Well, it's better than nothing." > Agreed 100%. Combine that with the fact that any given Word document > may: > > - use fonts that are present only on the creator's system > - have links to external graphic files > - have embedded OLE 'objects' that need to be rendered by their host > application > - etc. > > Print-to-fax solves every one of these problems. As does saving the file in (PS|PDF|TIFF) format, which then leaves you with more submission options than print-to-fax. Matt ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*