![]() |
At 10:53 PM 4/2/2002 -0800, you wrote: >>I realize there is an obvious trade-off here. > >If there is a problem with HylaFAX it is that it expects the sender's fax >to make use of RTN, so it deletes the corrupt page and expects a >replacement to come. The problem with that assumption is that some >senders out there don't make use of our RTN signal. So it is possible that Hylafax will delete a corrupt page and the sender will never know? Taking this to the worst case, if a one page fax is sent then we could miss the entire fax and the sender wouldn't be aware of this? Does this happen even if the receiving fax were a stand-alone machine rather than Hylafax? Basically, if the sending fax machine ignores RTN then shame on them? By the way, Hylafax is an excellent application and we like it a lot. I just want to make sure we totally understand its behavior in this situation. Regards, Dustin --- Dustin Puryear <dpuryear@usa.net> UNIX and Network Consultant http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear PGP Key available at http://www.us.pgp.net In the beginning the Universe was created. This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null