![]() |
Hello Lee, I see your point. You are perfectly right, the old version of man page should be available. It would be of great use though, when one would identify to wich versions it holds true. And vice versa the new version should not be mistaken as valid for an older distribution. I believe adding a line telling the users real situation (hylafax versions covered by this man page) will not hurt anybody. Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 6:36:23 PM, you wrote: LH> On 2002.03.26 09:13 Barometer wrote: >> Hello Lee, >> >> Hey, how could he know that hylafax changed the way it works. The >> older help file is still there and it is not identified to be no more >> valid. Instead of changing somebody else's FAQ, mind your own help >> version control. Am I wrong? LH> If somebody is using an old version, they need the man page for the old LH> version, and any comment about deprecation will only be confusing to LH> individuals who have difficulty understanding why their on-system man page LH> states something different than what the on-line man page states or why LH> they don't have a particular man page on their system when there is one LH> on-line. LH> Lee. -- Best regards, Barometer mailto:pribor_barometer@yahoo.de _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null