![]() |
At 06:57 AM 1/23/01 -0800, Wilmes, Rusty wrote: >The docs on hylafax.org seem to contradict themselves r.e. the version >of libtiff that's required. > >http://www.hylafax.org/howto/install.php is the page I'm referring to. > >First it says at the top of section 2 that... > > "Be aware that if you intend to install and run without patching >HylaFAX 4.1beta2 or any earlier version it is imperitive that you use >libtiff 3.4." Yes, HylaFAX 4.1beta2 *requires* libtiff 3.4. >Then in section 2.2.2 it says that for the same Hylafax package libtiff must >be >"3.5.5 or better" > > >Which of these is correct? Both of them are correct. The HylaFAX RPMs are generated currently from CVS snapshots rather than the 4.1beta2 tarball because new version releases are slow to come-by because of all the other platforms that need to be supported in a new release. Technically the HylaFAX RPMs are not using the same HylaFAX source code as "4.1beta2", and these CVS sources support libtiff-3.5 also. Since the RPM is built on a system with libtiff-3.5 it is required that systems on which the RPM is installed also have libtiff-3.5. libtiff-3.5.4 had bugs in it that would interfere with the proper appearance of short-page faxes, so it is a recommended upgrade to move to libtiff-3.5.5. Even RedHat suggests this, as it is on either their errata list or their bugfix/upgrade list. >I'm at libtiff version 3.5.4-5 on a Redhat 6.2 installation. Do I need >to revert to 3.4 or upgrade to 3.5.5? You don't *need* to do anything, and the RPM should install dandy. However, my recommendation to you at the moment, until Darren releases a new RPM, to not use 4.1beta2-8rh6 because it does not install the correct init scripts. If you do use the 8rh6 RPM, then you need to get the init scripts from the 2rh7 RPM. Instead I would recommend that you use CVS (http://www.hylafax.org/cvs.php) and patch it with the last patches posted on these bugs: http://bugs.hylafax.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62 http://bugs.hylafax.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81 http://bugs.hylafax.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88 http://bugs.hylafax.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90 http://bugs.hylafax.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 Patching the source in this case is not critical to the proper functionality of HylaFAX - but it does fix some documentation problems and adds a few features. Or, better yet, grab the 4.1beta2-2rh7 SRPM, make any appropriate changes to the spec file (notably in the "requires" and "version" sections), replace the tarball with CVS, and build your own RPM. Lee. >Thanks in advance! >Rusty >rwilmes@facey.com > ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null