Re: flexfax: SuSE rpm hylafax 4.1?

[Nico Kadel-Garcia <raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, George Zeigler wrote:

> Hello,
> 	found the RedHat rpms for HylaFax beta 4.1 at
> ftp://ftp.hylafax.org/pub/hylafax/.  I've limited experience with rpms but can
> figure it out.  I'm just wondering if it will cause me a problem if I upgraded
> my SuSE with them.  From limited experience, I think I would have to use a
> source rpm, not binary, and change directory path's to suite SuSE in one of
> the files after exploding and before compiling.  Correct?  And what's the

Umm. Sounds like a good idea. You should be able to alter them in the
config.site or config.local files to the SuSE defaults.

> difference between sparc and i386?

sparc was compiled on a Sparcstation. Completely different CPU, not compatible
with x86 processors.

> 	If I ever get my SuSE working with HylaFax, I'm definitely submitting a
> help page for SuSE people to the HylaFax site maintainers.

Do it! Please! And feel free to create or submit a SuSE rpm file.

			Nico Kadel-Garcia
			Senior Engineer, CIRL 
			Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary
			raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBOHlrsz/+ItycgIJRAQGlyAP+Jfm6ubsVyCUCuquYPTye1sNU2Xjv1Ozo
ERLQEHsiCGfG+wZYZ8m26aLSsljjBJ4xEFEjCzLWnLtF6CKlMfWiciQt0G4PqVPe
xX2HKTIMPXTX8Fx+pyA4PO3/qpROMYBkpTF1Ul5UutmH5UB99sohTFEeB7mGOQH+
GQMIDGUD1uk=
=2jyO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----