Re: Misc. ramblings about older USR modems

To: rside@aiinc.bc.ca (Robert Side)
Subject: Re: flexfax: Misc. ramblings about older USR modems
From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Cc: flexfax@sgi.com
Reply-To: flexfax@sgi.com
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 08:41:01 +0100 (BST)

> RECV/CQ: Bad 1D pixel count, row 2138, got 0, expected 1728
> RECV/CQ: Bad 1D pixel count, row 2139, got 0, expected 1728
> RECV/CQ: Bad 1D pixel count, row 2140, got 0, expected 1728
> RECV/CQ: Bad 1D pixel count, row 2141, got 0, expected 1728
> RECV/CQ: Bad 1D pixel count, row 2142, got 0, expected 1728
> RECV/CQ: adjusting for trailing noise (5 run)
> RECV: 2138 total lines, 0 bad lines, 0 consecutive bad lines
> 
> Is this good, bad, or indifferent?

Indifferent to good.  There were no transmission errors but the page
length may have been wrong by just under a millimetre.

References:
- Re: Misc. ramblings about older USR modems
  - From: Robert Side <rside@aiinc.bc.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: bad exit status 0x6 from sub-fork
Next by Date: cannot compile libtiff
Prev by thread: Re: Misc. ramblings about older USR modems
Next by thread: client access ?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Project hosted by iFAX Solutions