![]() |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Fri, 3 Apr 1998, Gregory Massel wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Steve Williams wrote: > > > The USR Sportsters, one of the most popular modems sold, are agreed by > > EVERYONE, that for commercial use, the ARE JUNK!!!. > > That is a pretty harsh statement. For commercial *FAX* use, they may be > junk, but they make damn good data modems. In my experience, I've > had many customers replace a variety of different modems with sportsters > and seen much improved data connection reliability and connect rates. They used to be good. The 33.6 Sportster I have sucks the giant wazoo of death. As I understand it, if you bought one of the super el-cheapo ones a year or two back, they were el-cheapo because there was a known flow control bug and they were trying to dump them all before going to 56K modems. And they were ***AWFUL*** about trying to upgrade the ROM's, pulling the Microsoft trick of denying the problem and trying to blame your computer or software. I no longer buy or recommend USR: they weren't as bad as Zoom, but they were working on it for a while. Nico Garcia Engineer, CIRL Mass. Eye and Ear Infirmary raoul@cirl.meei.harvard.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNSUNvD/+ItycgIJRAQHUlQP9Ea0pEQQGlU5YlxlnlOBOUFLHClA95Z4E 5rvdUuCJe9g8fYahrNvXKu1fKvED+/2ZIMW7+uIbWlpYgsuVnMKhr0smqOYNDZFK bdZX8gaVCMCiyCx04H+Zeq6lQ68CAUJhVadwECDiH15/vOOvgCQTaYRmrwz8CDex A134kcZRiC8= =JENM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----