![]() |
> > Steve Williams wrote: > > > > > > > I have HylaFax4.0pl0 installed in my system, and I compiled pl1. Now I > > want to install pl1, but I'm affraid just making "make install" > > without "faxsetup" could not be enough. > > > > Please, take away my fears, and tell me I don't need to reconfigure it > > all, and "make install" is enough... > > > > I'm waiting for this to upgrade... > > > > Yes, it should be fine. Make sure that NONE of the executables from pl0 > are running when you do the "make install". For example, hfaxd, faxgetty, > faxq. > > If you have done customization to any files ( faxcover.ps, notify,... ), > I would make a backup copy of them as well, just to make sure. The install > script SHOULD notice that they are different & put a message "Local Changes > to XXXX", but it's better to be save than sorry. > > The config files won't be touched, & all should be OK. > > I'm not really sure about that; e.g. this would not work if you've > changed the location of the spooling area or some other values > before running ./configure; > > faxsetup(1M) writes a file etc/setup.cache which all other > server scripts include for getting the environment; if this > file no longer reflect your values from ./configure HylaFAX > will not work; > Yes, you are correct. I was "blinded" by the way that I have been doing things here, & a) did not consider the whole picture b) did not explain myself good enough. I have a "config.site" that I preserve across builds of different Patch Levels. By putting this into my build directory of the new patch level BEFORE I run ./configure, I am sure to have the same configuration, given that nothing radical has changed in the source code itself. This is the step that I have been doing for so long, I forgot that most people would NOT be doing this. Sorry about the confusion... -- Steve Williams, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Genie Computer Systems Inc. steve@genie96.com