![]() |
Lorenzo M. Catucci wrote: On Fri, 3 Jan 1997, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > You didn't explain what your problem is. If your problem > is the missing strings from your sendfax(1) command at your > cover-page you should read the man page of sendfax(1) > for the right order of the arguments. > Dear Matthias, I just tried reading the man page once more, and I didn't find an hint to the right argument order; hence, I think that the order is meaningless. Never the less, I tried the order which appears in the man page, and I got the very same result: sendfax doesn't tell faxcover anything abot the way it should fill the Regarding: and the Company: fields, regardless of the order in which I put the options on the command line, and the fact that I put in a space between the option and the strings. Hope this clarifies my problem. As a matter of fact, I'm using 4.0pl0 under linux 2.0.27 - libc 5.3.12 The man page of sendfax(1) states clearly: The order of options on the command line is significant. Each fax to be transmitted is assigned the current value of parameters specified on the command line; e.g. whether or not to generate a cover page. This means that options that specify parameters for a particular destination must precede the dialstring specified with the -d option. So the rigth order is: $ sendfax -x "The Company" -y "The Department" -c "No Comment" ... -d ..." Just try it. matthias -- firm: matthias.apitz@softcon.de [voc:+49-89-61308-351, fax: +49-89-61308-188] priv: guru@thias.muc.de WWW: http://www.softcon.de/~guru/ OR http://www.guug.de/GUUG/firmen/apitz/ "We don't care. We don't have to. You'll buy whatever we ship, so why bother? We're Microsoft." (found in Usenet)