Re: [hylafax-users] questioning the sense of RETURNFILETYPE

[Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100329 10:42]:

>> because he wants to know if the content was readable enough ...
>> regenerating the file kind of defeats the purpose of sending the file
>> back to the user.
>
> I'm not sure that I concur with it defeating the purpose.  I don't see  
> much purpose in returning the file in the first place, so it's a bit  
> difficult to defeat a lack of purpose.

eheh...

I've often wondered why we see so many people clambering for a "please
give me back another copy of what I just gave you" set of options...

Seems to fit right in with the emails that are a zillion pages long
because they keep just quoting and adding 1 line at the top (to the
replies of replies, each with their quoted 20-line long bogus notice
about legally hindering confidentiality requirements).

</rant>

;-)

a.

-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@xxxxxxxxxxx                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature