![]() |
Uwe Dippel ha scritto: > As promised, we have done a huge number of experiments with always the
same hardware (especially the same modem), with a number of operating systems and CFs.
It remains conclusive that the Timeouts have not much to make with the modem, contrary to what has been stated. I am still using the cheap MODEM AGERE OCM V.92 VER2.7A (JUN 14 2004). My test situation (the one that broke repeatedly) was a fax of > 20 pages, hyperfine. By now my experience stretches across several dozens of such transmissions, usually lasting in the range of 1 hour each. OpenBSD 4.2 running from hard disk would experience those timeouts rarely (maybe 1 in 100 pages, if at all). The same version, simply 'dd'-ed to a CF, would have a large number of errors; in the range of 1 per 12 pages. Setting the CF to 'softupdates' would improve the situation, without being optimal.
Against our earlier decision, I removed the CF from the embedded system, plugged in another one (not a faster one, rather a slower one), with Debian Testing installed, and not much else. Since then, despite of > 5 hours of sending hundreds of pages in hyperfine, we did not experience a single "T.30 T2 timeout". Please, no flames, I prefer OpenBSD to Debian any day; and I don't want to imply that either is better or worse. However, our extensive tests show 2 results:
1. T.30 T2 timeouts - at least in our case - cannot be attributed to the cheap modem nor noisy lines (all is done directly from a commercial PABX)
2. T.30 T2 timeouts depend on the operating systems as well as storage.
thanks riccardo
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*