![]() |
>However, I've noticed that faxes are being sent sequentially. That is, >it has to wait for one modem to finish before sending the next fax. I >am basing this on what I'm seeing from doing a tail -f on >/var/log/messages as well as by running faxstat. Are all of your faxes going to the same number? Hylafax is configured by default to "pipeline" faxes to the same number, assuming that the destination has just 1 fax line, and saving call setup and negotiation time. If this is the case, you could test it by sending to several different numbers at the same time. This behavior is configured by MaxConcurrentCalls and MaxBatchJobs. MaxBatchJobs defaults to 64 and is the number of faxes (not pages) to the same number that it will send sequentially in one call (if there are that many faxes available) MaxConcurrentCalls defaults to 1 and controls how many different calls can be simultaneously sent to the same fax number. However, for the server to make a second call to the number, you would have to have enough faxes in the send queue to that number to exceed the MaxBatchJobs threshold, and by default that's 64. Interestingly, if you have 64 faxes waiting, then send another fax, it will go out immediately, because the existing ones are already being accounted for as being in progress. I don't know enough about your fax card to speak for its capabilities, but I do know that they sell it with differing amounts of "ports" - i.e. the ability to communicate on that many lines simultaneously. So if it's a 2 port card, you can only send on two lines at once. -Siri Vias ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*