![]() |
On Dec 19, 2007 10:55 PM, Tiago Teixeira <teixeira1985@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > About Aidan's suggestion: > I restarted the server in other previous days, and the issue stills on. > I attach some logs, and I paste here a piece of the last one. > > [root@asterisk log]# cat c000004620 > Dec 19 16:06:30.31: [ 4502]: SESSION BEGIN 000004620 +351244851974 > Dec 19 16:06:30.31: [ 4502]: HylaFAX (tm) Version 5.1.4 > About Lee's question: > [root@asterisk recvq]# date > Wed Dec 19 21:48:57 WET 2007 > [root@asterisk recvq]# faxinfo fax000001732.tif > fax000001732.tif: > Sender: > Pages: 1 > Quality: Normal > Page: ISO A4 > Received: 2007:12:19 16:06:46 As far as I know Portugal is on the same timezone as UTC/GMT (so is WET timezone your date command shows), so you should be one of the lucky ones to not have any UTC/GMT issues at all. Is the server clock actually on GMT/UTC? I think Lee asked for a faxinfo on a just received fax to see the diffence with the date output. When you say that faxes come marked 1 hour later, what timestamp are you referring to? It's the faxinfo output in the email, the timestamp of the email, the timestamp of the file on disk, ...? -- giulioo@xxxxxxxxx ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*