![]() |
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:00:57 -0700 Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > > >Is there any reason JobProtection wasn't extended to cover both (and > >maybe renamed to QueueProtection with a JobProtection alias)? I can't > >see a situation where an administrator would be concerned that a user > >can know jobs are in the queue, but not faxes, or vice versa? > > My level of confidence in second-guessing all administrators out there > in this respect was not enough to make me want to combine the two > features into one and lose independent queue control as you're suggesting. I would keep the two parameters, and I would like to use the same name and semantics of hylafax+, so that users may learn how to use it only once. Tomorrow, if everybody agree, I will create a patch for hylafax, using the code in hylafax+. Bye, Giuseppe ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*