![]() |
Quoting Chris Taylor <chris.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:I've been search for some examples but I'm not finding many.
I'm finally setting up my dispatch script and so far I'm just using a case for SENDER. What I'd like to do is also route other faxes by CIDNUMBER.
I just want to make sure that no faxes are lost or double emails are send. Below is what I have so far:
case $SENDER in
*305*243*5662*) SENDTO="health@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";;
*) SENDTO=faxin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;;
esac
case $CIDNUMBER in
*215*368*1960*) SENDTO="rigan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";;
*) SENDTO=faxin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;;
esac
My question is do I only need the catch-all in the last case or should each case have it?
Every different case needs the *) entry.
No. If you add a catch-all to every case (and all the cases are used to set the SENDTO variable), only the last case block will actually work as the catch-all entry will replace any value set by a previous case block.
You should only put a catch-all entry in the first block (or set the SENDTO default value before all the case block and don't set any catch-all entry). You should also put the blocks from lowest priority to highest. i.e. if a fax matches an entry in both SENDER and CIDNUMBER, the entry of the last block will replace the entry set in the first block.
--Patrice Fournier iFAX Solutions, Inc. www.ifax.com
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*