Re: [hylafax-users] a quickie

["Darren Nickerson" <darren.nickerson@xxxxxxxx>]

"Peter Verhoeven" <Peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks Lee - "Hylafax+" ? First I've heard of that ;)
>
> Is it safe to install over the top of an existing Hylafax 4.3.1
> installation in production. i.e. can I just "rpm -U
> hylafax-5.0.4-1rh9.i386.rpm"? Will it overwrite my config files?
>
> Asumming that RH9 is what I should be using in case of Centos 4.3.

Just FYI, we're not aware of a bug in 4.3.1 that would orphan sendq/ files 
such as you saw. If you have the logs (syslog will do for a start) from 
around the time these jobs were submitted, we'd be very interested in taking 
a look. You can mail them to me directly.

-Darren


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*