![]() |
On Wed, 24 May 2006 11:09:24 -0700 Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When Darren forked HylaFAX from Matthias Apitz he did not change the > name. This only made sense, too... it was still HylaFAX. When Corel > purchased WordPerfect they did not change the name. Why? Because it > was still WordPerfect. Because someone is doing something wrong doesn't mean we'll follow along those lines. I personaly prefer the way "sylpheed" was forked as "sylpheed-claws". > Darren sells a product based on a proprietary fork of HylaFAX ... it is > called "HylaFAX Enterprise Edition". If he truly believes that forks > should be named differently then he would have not used "HylaFAX" in the > name of his product. well, your fork is just named "Hylafax", at least Darren named it "Hylafax enterprise edition", which to me tells me there is a differences. > I've tried to make the differences clear by the website content. > However, the project development occurring at sourceforge is for the > same project as the development at hylafax.org. They're just different > cuts of code, basically. i'm sorry i started this whole thread, it wasn't my intention to start a debate but lets be honest, looking at the hylafax project on sourceforge we even see similar version numbers. ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*