Re: [hylafax-users] hylafax-4.2.3 on a centos 4.2

[Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@xxxxxxxx>]

* Adam Bisbe <bblp@xxxxxxxxx> [051230 07:45]:
 
> I Should have tried with a normal postcript file and not with  
> faxcover.ps.

Right - this makes complete sense.  faxcover.ps isn't a complete
postscript file until the dictionary containing the symbols is
inserted into it (see faxcover man page).

This is made clear by the postscript error below, where comments is
undefined:

> Error: /undefined in comments
> Operand stack:
>  413.663 29 141.336 189
> Execution stack:
>  %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- -- 
> nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- -- 
> nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop  
> --nostringval-- 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 -- 
> nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push -- 
> nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
> Dictionary stack:
>  --dict:1067/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:113/200(L)--
> Current allocation mode is local
> GNU Ghostscript 7.07: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1



-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             aidan@xxxxxxxx
Senior Software Developer                          +1 215 438-4638 x8103
iFAX Solutions, Inc.                                http://www.ifax.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature