Re: [hylafax-users] Spooler performance

To: Mike Tkachuk <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] Spooler performance
From: Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: hylafax-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:18:02 -0800

Mike Tkachuk wrote:

The faxq CPU time usage growing is not linear,
meaning that with 1000 jobs the load is ~5%, with 2000 jobs it's
like 10% and with 3000 jobs average CPU usage is ~50%.

What happens if you disable batching? (You do that by setting "MaxBatchJobs: 1" in /var/spool/hylafax/etc/config.)

Thanks,

Lee.

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*

Follow-Ups:
- [hylafax-users] Re[2]: Spooler performance
  - From: Mike Tkachuk

References:
- [hylafax-users] Spooler performance
  - From: Mike Tkachuk

Prev by Date: Re: [hylafax-users] R: Implentation of DTMF DID with Hylafax 4.2.3
Next by Date: [hylafax-users] modem/card with analog ETSI Caller ID support
Previous by thread: [hylafax-users] Spooler performance
Next by thread: [hylafax-users] Re[2]: Spooler performance
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Project hosted by iFAX Solutions