Re: [hylafax-users] Is DID required for this application?

[Lee Howard <faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2005.02.25 11:54 "Donald, Adam" wrote:
> Lee
>
> Thank you, again, for your insight.
> I am running the latest firmware on our MT5634ZPX-PCI-U modems (both
> ttyS1 &
> ttyS2).  Seeing as the solution you gave, AT+FCLASS=1.0;+F34=14,1,2;A,
> seems to work well, how important is it that v.17 gets fixed?

It's only important if you intend to use these modems to *send* faxes.  
And if you do, then it's quite important.

> Will this pose a
> potential problem in the future if it doesn't get resolved, perhaps
> with other modems or fax equipment?

If our testing is correct, then you won't be able to *send* faxes with 
V.17.  So, you could disable V.17 altogether in your Class 1 sending 
config if you wanted, but then you would limit your non-V.34 fax 
sessions to 9600 baud.

Lee.

____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null
 *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*