![]() |
hylafax-users-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/05/2004 05:00:40 PM: > Mostly for Lee Howard, and/or Steve Tuckner, > > The models and their descriptions are (according to > http://www.multitech.com/PRODUCTS/Families/MultiModemZPX/ ) > > MT5634ZPX-PCI-U-NV description: V.92 Data/Fax World Modem > MT5634ZPX-PCI-U description: V.92 Voice/Data/Fax World Modem > MT5634ZPX-PCI-NV description: V.90 Data/Fax World Modem > MT5634ZPX-PCI description: V.90 Voice/Data/Fax World Modem > > Am I correct in my understanding that, for a faxing only setup, all of > the above are equally good and I can buy on price? > > I can stick to the NV models (I suspect it means "no voice") if they are > cheaper? > > The V.90 to V.92 distinction is related to 56K data connections, not > faxing, so again whichever is cheaper is fine? V.90 and V.92 are related to faxing. V.92 gives you the 33.6kbps faxing option listed on the linked page as, "Class 1.0 and Class 2.1 faxing at speeds to V.34/33.6K bps (Super G3)." I'm running four multitech modems in Class 1.0 with the current CVS head with great success and I'm seeing probably 25% (give or take) of the faxes coming in using speeds greater than 14,400. If you're doing outgoing faxes, this would result in saved money due to decreased long distance costs. My setup is mostly incoming, but this also helps in handling more calls with fewer modems (I would like to think so at least). Chris ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxx*