![]() |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Howard [mailto:faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:08 AM > To: Sedat > Cc: hylafax-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [hylafax-users] QualifyCID. CID Rejected but Fax still > Received. > > On 2003.12.30 22:53 Sedat wrote: > > > > > > What about > > a-) waiting until line stops ringing (no RING from modem for nn > > secs.) > > This runs the possibility that the RING from one call stops and the > RING from another starts in less than nn secs. > [Sedat ] Yes I know, that is why I have the plan b-) . If your telco supports CID, then if you receive a new call within nn secs, your telco will send a new CID which will activate plan b-) Only problem which remains is that, if the call originates from a switch that does not support CID than that call will not be answered ( but for sure he will try again some time later) > > then reinitialize the modem or > > b-) a new CID info is received (a new call is on the line) then > > start CID > > check again > > This can, in effect, be accomplished already with CIDNumberAnswerLength > and setting RingsBeforeAnswer to zero. > > > Not very polite but one can answer and then drop the line as well :-( > > Like maybe with a "RejectCIDCmd: ATH1\nATH0" option? [Sedat ] Yeah that would be my last take > > Some people use QualifyCID to cause faxgetty to only answer calls from > known-fax-senders so that they can use the line for voice purposes when > it rings 3 or more times. So the historical default behavior can't be > changed. A theoretical RejectCIDCmd could allow some versatility here, > though. > > Lee. [Sedat ] ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@xxxxxxxxxxxx*