![]() |
Hi Giulio, I may experiment with using faxgetty to see if that makes a difference. I will add another detail, though, that the timeout does not include message processing/initialization. I am just talking about the time from between it saying that a fax has completed and it beginning the next job. Thanks, Jess On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 13:09, Giulio Orsero wrote: > On 13 Aug 2002 12:30:17 -0400, "Jesse D. Sightler" > <jsightler@eximtechnologies.com> wrote: > > >If it makes a difference, I am not using faxgetty. Would this be > >useful? > > Don't think it would make a time difference. It's only that faxgetty would > log more stuff since it's always alive trying to get the modem. > > So maybe it would only be useful to see clearly when time is spent. > > I think HylaFAX check if the modem is free for use every 30sec, so if you > sum this to the time it need to initialize modem you can get something near > 1min. > > You can reduce 30 sec by some parameter, look at man hylafax-config and > search the string 30. > ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To subscribe/unsubscribe, click http://lists.hylafax.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi On UNIX: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null *To learn about commercial HylaFAX(tm) support, mail sales@hylafax.org.*