![]() |
I am not a member of this list, but I believe that this message is an important one and I hope that the moderator will post it. A lot of receiving fax machines will accept both 2D and 1D compression for faxes, and HylaFAX is supposed to be able to determine the proper scheme to use. According to the sendfax man page and other documentation "HylaFAX will by default use the optimal compression scheme supported by the transmitting modem and receiving facsimile device." However, an examination of the system logs shows that, after giving HylaFAX a PostScript file to transmit, the compression occurs *before* any negotiation with the receiving fax machine and hence *before* the capabilities of the receiving machine can be determined. In a lot of cases, the logs show that the receiving fax can accept 2D but the compression has already been made by HylaFAX to 1D. The HylaFAX file that does the compression is ps2fax and the default setting is to use 1D. I am using a Class 1 modem and it is capable of both 1D and 2D. Why does the documentation claim that HylaFAX determines optimal compression based on the receiving machine when this is clearly not the case? If the -2 parameter is not specified in the sendfax command line, HylaFAX will only produce a 1D compressed file from the PostScript input. A good improvement for future versions of HylaFAX should be file compression that occurs only *after* a negotiation with the receiving fax machine has determined all relevant capabilities. Larry Andrew Piet Detroit, MI USA ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null