Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.

["Vyacheslav Frolov" <v.frolov@globalone.ru>]

Joe Matuscak wrote:

> Unfortunately, now that all the fine logs show
> stuff as being sent calss 1, 2-d it actually takes longer that it did when
> running class 1 with 1-d.

That is very strange.

Check if ps2fax do 2D with 2D scanlines like this:

$ bin/ps2fax -r 98 -w 1728 -l 280 -m 4294967295 -1 -o 1d.tif docq/doc296.cover
$ bin/ps2fax -r 98 -w 1728 -l 280 -m 4294967295 -1 -o 1d.tif docq/doc296.cover
$ tiffcp -c g3:2d:fill 1d.tif  12d.tif
$ tiffcp -c g3:2d:fill 2d.tif  22d.tif
$ ls -l *d.tif
-rw-rw-r--    1 frolov   frolov      12218 Sep  6 18:59 1d.tif
-rw-rw-r--    1 frolov   frolov       9443 Sep  6 18:57 2d.tif
-rw-rw-r--    1 frolov   frolov       9416 Sep  6 19:21 12d.tif
-rw-rw-r--    1 frolov   frolov       9416 Sep  6 19:21 22d.tif

Size of 2d.tif shold be less then size of 1d.tif.
Sizes of 2d.tif, 12d.tif and 22d.tif shold be much of a size.

Vyacheslav.




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null