Re: [hylafax-users] HylaFAX performance vs regular fax machine.

[Giulio Orsero <giulioo@pobox.com>]

On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:32:35 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:


>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: REMOTE best format 2-D MMR
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: REMOTE supports T.30 Annex A, ECM
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: REMOTE best 20 ms, 10 ms/scanline
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 14400 bit/s
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 20 ms, 10 ms/scanline
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: SEND file "docq/doc65.cover;30"
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE page width 1728 pixels in 215 mm
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE unlimited page length
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 3.85 line/mm
>Sep 05 09:50:35.75: [ 3949]: USE 1-D MR

Didn't follow all the thread, however, are you using faxgetty?
If not then you have to tell HylaFAX to use 2d with faxmodem.

-- 
giulioo@pobox.com


____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null