Re: [hylafax-users] Solaris 2.6

[Robert Steinmetz <rob@steinmetznet.com>]

Lee Howard wrote:

> At 02:53 PM 7/22/01 -0400, Robert Steinmetz wrote:
> >I just downloaded the 4.1 release and reviewed the release note. I
> >noticed a comment about minor problem with Solaris compiling.
> >
> >I decided to try it and update my old version of HylaFAX. the configure
> >script would not run on Solaris x86 2.6. It left no log and only
> >returns;
> >
> >./configure: test: argument expected
>
> I can't be sure, but I think that this is a problem that was caused when
> the "beta" and "rc" series ended and broke some shell scripting in
> configure.  This has been fixed in CVS.  Or... you could edit configure at
> line 443 to read:
>
> if [ "$DIST_TYPE" = beta ]; then
>
> (note the quotes)

Thanks that fixed it

>
>
> >A search of the mailing list archive reveals no messages on point.
> >
> >Therefore 2 questions;
> >
> >1) What is meant by minor Solaris problems and are they being worked on?
>
> At the time it meant that there were reports that rc2 ran into 'make
> install' errors because of a poorly written makefile.

I got some warnings during Make" and "make install" reported Nothing todo in
some directories , but no errors.
I'm going to try to set it up and see if it works.

> A fix was created,
> but it has not been applied to CVS, because it was not followed-up by the
> reporter.
>
> Lee.

--
Robert Steinmetz,       rob@steinmetznet.com
Principal
Steinmetz & Associates
New Orleans  Atlanta




____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
 To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null