![]() |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:31:02AM -0400, Network wrote: > > I don't think we're on the same page here. > > Yes, it only answers what you tell it to. > > It may only *log data* from RingFax calls, though. If you're using > > both RingFax and RingVoice to allow you to specify both strings, then > > you might expect this. > > > > Our set-up is .... > > > One phone line with primary and secondary numbers (one pair of wires) > > > hylafax is configured to only answer/pick-up on the secondary line via, > > > RingFax: RING1 > > > However. hylafax will and faithfully does log cnid data from the primary > > > number/ring -and- will *not* see/log any cnid data from the secondary number > > > which hylafax answers in order to receive a fax. We also use hylafax to > send > > > faxes :)) That's all we use hylafax for. Nothing else. > > > > Ok. I suspect, but cannot prove without checking, that FaxGetty > > wouldn't log the CNID for any call it wasn't going to answer. > MR. JRA., Dear sir; :) What you stated above is in fact being done and working. Hylafax and/ or faxgetty is logging the cnid data on the voice line= primary number. hylafax/faxgetty is *not* seeing/logging any cid-data from incoming calls on the secondary/distictive ring number which it answers and receives faxes on. :o) > > > > Try *changing* RingFax to RING2, restarting everything, and seeing if > > you now get CNID logged only on *that* ring's calls. I'm sorry sir, this too doesn't solve the current problem. BTW, do you remember me stating; I had juggled or tried various ring_strings in the past for RingFax? In any case it didn't work then. I have switched it again (as-per your suggestion)= not working now. - This is a healthy discussion on this issue however, I'm getting the consensus that this hasn't been tested with distinctive ring (cid-data logging). ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null