![]() |
At 12:58 AM 5/23/01 +0200, Bernd Proissl wrote: > > >> >Note the & at the end to run in background, this simulates somehow >> concurrent >> >access from multiple users. >> >> I haven't been able to try this yet, but is it safe to assume that the odd >> behavior doesn't happen when the ampersand (&) is removed, stopping the >> sendfax process from operating in the background? > >Please note that not only one sendfax is run in the background. If the document >to be faxed is relatively large then more than one sendfax connects to hfaxd at >one point in time (simulating multiple users faxing concurrently) > >Don't know whether this makes a significant difference for the problem :-) >I am not able to reproduce this. I just tried this on a test system with three modems, a batch of 30 fax jobs via sendfax, and with the background operation (using &). I can't reproduce the problem, either. Lee. ____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________ To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe hylafax-users-request@hylafax.org < /dev/null